November 21, 2014 Meeting

Agenda

Friday, November 21, 2014
8:10 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.
Counseling Conference Room
1. Introduction – New SLOASC member Michael Jiles
2. Follow Up on Curriculum Discussion/SLOASC Charter
3. SLO “Tech Review” Process/Rubric for CSLO & PSLO Approvals
4. Dialogue Day
5. Next Meeting – December 19th and January 16th, Inservice conflict.

Minutes

Friday, November 21, 2014

8:10 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.

Counseling Conference Room

Present:            Paul Blake, Jill Brown, Joe’ll Chaidez, Geoffrey Dyer, Vicki Jacobi, Michael Jiles, Michelle Oja, Brandy Young

  • Introduction – New SLOASC member Michael Jiles – This item not discussed.
  • Follow Up on Curriculum Discussion/SLOASC Charter – No Action Item Points of discussion:
    • The Curriculum Committee has recommended that SLO/ASC be the group that reviews SLOs when submitted on Course Outline of Record
    • Should the members of the Alternative Committee Assignment workgroup develop a process for reviewing SLOs as they are submitted with CORs?
    • Should SLO/ASC review its Charter once again?
    • With the new Accreditation Standards, SLOs must now be attached to CORs
    •  
  • SLO “Tech Review” Process/Rubric for CSLO & PSLO Approvals – No Action Item Points of discussion:
    • SLO/ASC meetings used be conducted the same way that the current Curriculum meetings are conducted in order to review and approve SLOs in a systematic way
    • The goal of SLO/ASC was to ensure that SLOs were “meaningful and measureable
    • Comprehensive Program Review could be the time when all SLOs are reviewed at the course and program level – look at one whole program at a time
    • How are SLOs currently approved? Are they approved?
    • During Comprehensive Program Review, all SLOs be refined by discipline faculty
    • SLO/ASC should also look at SLOs for courses and programs as they are submitted
    • SLO/ASC should meet more frequently than once a month in order to review SLOs.
  • Dialogue Day – This item was not discussed
  • Other – No Action Taken

 

Rubric presented by Vicki that measures competency, content concerns and Basic Skills

4 3 2 1
Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Content Basic Skills

 

 

The committee discussed the difficulty of eLumen housing a rubric to contain these three separate concerns and in creating reports that would make this information apparent to faculty. The committee discussed presenting ideas like this in Senate, Faculty Reports, FIGs, and other venues.

  • Next Meeting – December 19th and January 16th, Inservice conflict.
    • The next meeting will be on December 19th at 8:10 a.m. in the Counseling Conference Room

Supporting Docs

©